First in a series

Anmerkung des Herausgebers: Jeden Sommer hat Common Cause New York das Glück, von den Talenten und der Energie einer Gruppe von Praktikanten profitieren zu können. Sie helfen uns bei der Recherche zu unseren Themen, organisieren unsere Aktivisten und erledigen so ziemlich alles andere, was getan werden muss. Als sie zu ihren Campussen zurückkehrten, baten wir sie, über ihre Zeit bei Common Cause und die Herausforderungen, vor denen unsere Demokratie steht, nachzudenken.

By Ben Winters, Law Intern, Cybersecurity and Elections

As a legal intern this summer, I’ve been able to work on cybersecurity in elections. From day to day, it may rule the news cycle or your social media feed, but every day as computing technology rapidly develops, the integrity of our elections is both strengthened and threatened. Needless to say, we are in a time of constant change and our governments should be changing to fit the times. The main areas of concern are the manipulation of actual votes and voting machines as well as potential tampering with voter rolls, where personal information for every registered voter is stored and where the name of each voter must be listed for him or her to vote on Election Day. 

There are two main choices for voting machines: Direct-Recording Electronic (DRE’s) and Optical Scan voting systems. A handful of states now use the DRE system. DRE machines display information entered on a memory card by a contractor and installed in each machine. The main concern researchers have found is that the computers the contractors use to program the ballots are connected to the internet and so are vulnerable to malware circulating online that could be used to manipulate votes to make a certain outcome. Some of these machines create a paper record of each vote, but audits of the votes, which compare the electronic count to the paper count, become meaningless because if the votes are tampered with when they’re entered, the paper copy simply reflects the tampering.

New York, as well as a large number of other states, uses an Optical Scan voting system. The voter fills out a paper ballot and feeds it into a scanner which electronically compiles the results. As a result, you have both a paper and electronic record. But New York as well as many other states, does not mandate post-election audits. What researchers and some lawmakers find absolutely critical is a shift to mandatory “risk-based” audits – which compare the ballots marked by voters to the electronic reports from the machines to verify that the apparent results are accurate.  

Such voter-verified paper trails (VVPat) have been a priority of some federal lawmakers but have not gained traction in Congress. Fourteen states have some sort of VVPat in place and some counties in other states do as well, but this is a vital step to ensure the sanctity of our elections, the cornerstone of our democracy.

###