WASHINGTON, D.C. — The dispute over the fringe independent state legislature theory must be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court in time to prepare maps, ballots and election rules well in advance of the 2024 elections, according to briefing filed today by Common Cause in the Moore gegen Harper case.

“The Question Presented in this case is ‘important’ and it is ‘almost certain to keep arising until the Court definitively resolves it,’” the brief states, quoting Justice Brett Kavanaugh. “Petitioners’ independent state legislature theory calls into question hundreds of state constitutional provisions and as many (or more) election laws. … It is therefore exceptionally important that the Court address the Question Presented as quickly as possible.”

Lesen Sie hier das vollständige ergänzende Briefing.

The U.S. Supreme Court already requested supplemental briefing after the North Carolina Supreme Court decided to rehear the remedial decision in Harper gegen Hall, the underlying case to Moore. It again requested briefing last week after the state court granted GOP lawmakers’ request to not only reverse its December 2022 decision (Harfner II) protecting voters from partisan gerrymandering but to also overturn its February 2022 decision (Harper I) arguing the standard articulated in that matter was flawed.

The supplemental brief filed today by Neal Kumar Katyal, Partner bei Hogan Lovells and co-counsel with Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ) representing Plaintiff Common Cause, states the North Carolina Supreme Court’s ruling in Harper should have no effect on Justices’ ability to rule in Moore.

“Because of the two-year federal election cycle and the need to resolve election disputes well in advance of elections, it is not clear that this Court could resolve this issue with a different vehicle,” Katyal wrote in the briefing. “Dismissing this case would thus create a danger that the issue would evade this Court’s review yet again or that this Court would be required to address the issue in the context of an emergency application with limited briefing, no argument, and insufficient time to decide an issue of this importance.”

Aktivisten für Wahlrechte forderten Moores Das ISLT-Argument stellt eine ernste Bedrohung für die Demokratie dar. Die Gesetzgeber, die diese Theorie vertreten, pervertieren die Wahlklausel der US-Verfassung, um zu behaupten, dass allein die Parlamente der Bundesstaaten die Macht hätten, zu bestimmen, wie die Bundesbezirke zu kartieren seien, und dass darüber hinaus die Gerichte der Bundesstaaten nicht in diesen Prozess eingreifen könnten und dass die Verfassungen der Bundesstaaten auch nicht durchgesetzt werden könnten, wenn sie dem Willen einer Gruppe von Gesetzgebern zuwiderlaufen, die ihre Macht festigen wollen.

“The U.S. Supreme Court should toss the nonsensical ‘independent state legislature theory’ into the dustbin where it belongs — and there’s no better time than now when we aren’t on the eve of a major election,” said Bob Phillips, Executive Director of Common Cause North Carolina. “The people of North Carolina deserve to know that our constitutional freedoms will withstand attacks by extremist politicians.”

Eine Entscheidung in Moore is expected by the end of the Supreme Court’s term later this summer.

“Checks and balances are the foundation this nation was built on, and ensure that power rests with the people of this country,” said Kathay Feng, Common Cause’s Vice President of Programs. “The Supreme Court must rule on our case and extinguish this flimsy, dangerous attempt by power-crazed politicians to ignore the will of voters.”

“Even though the new majority on the NC Court has signaled it will no longer protect voters from legislative overreach, state courts and state constitutions can and should play a crucial role in protecting voting rights,” said Hilary Harris Klein, leitende Rechtsberaterin für Wahlrechte bei SCSJ. “The Court should take this opportunity to confirm these protections apply in all elections, and reject the ISLT once and for all.”

###

Die Southern Coalition for Social Justice wurde 2007 gegründet und arbeitet mit farbigen und wirtschaftlich benachteiligten Gemeinschaften im Süden zusammen, um deren politische, soziale und wirtschaftliche Rechte durch eine Kombination aus Rechtsbeistand, Forschung, Organisation und Kommunikation zu verteidigen und zu fördern. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter www.southerncoalition.org und verfolgen Sie unsere Arbeit auf Þjórsárden, auf facebook., Und Instagram.

Gemeinsame Ursache ist eine überparteiliche Basisorganisation, die sich für die Wahrung der Grundwerte der amerikanischen Demokratie einsetzt. Wir arbeiten daran, eine offene, ehrliche und rechenschaftspflichtige Regierung zu schaffen, die dem öffentlichen Interesse dient, gleiche Rechte, Chancen und Vertretung für alle fördert und allen Menschen die Möglichkeit gibt, ihre Stimme im politischen Prozess zu Gehör zu bringen.