Menu

Campaign

Campaign Finance Reform

Money plays an oversized role in our elections, but there are policies we're fighting for that put power back in the hands of average Nebraskans.

From disclosing dark money contributions to placing common-sense limits on individual contributions, the Cornhusker state has options for reforming how we finance elections.

We all know that money plays too big of a role in our elections. That the people and organizations with the most money are the ones deciding who gets elected and the policies they pursue. Thankfully, there are steps we can take to expose secret donors and reign in unchecked spending.

Campaign finance reform is essential to ensure a fair and transparent political process in Nebraska. The current system, dominated by large contributions and undisclosed funding, undermines the integrity of our elections and erodes public trust in government. Implementing robust campaign finance reforms can restore confidence in our democratic institutions and ensure that every Nebraskan’s voice is heard.

Contribution Caps

One critical reform is the imposition of donor contribution caps. By limiting the amount that individuals and organizations can contribute to political campaigns, we can reduce the undue influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups. This ensures that candidates focus on broad-based community support rather than catering to a few high-dollar contributors. Contribution caps promote equity, making it possible for candidates from diverse backgrounds to compete on a more level playing field.

 

Dark Money Disclosure

Another vital policy is the mandatory disclosure of dark money. Currently, significant amounts of money are funneled into Nebraska’s political system through opaque channels, with little to no transparency about the sources of these funds. Requiring full disclosure of all political donations and expenditures will shine a light on who is funding campaigns and help voters make more informed decisions. Transparency in campaign financing is crucial for holding candidates and elected officials accountable to the public.

By enacting these and other campaign finance reforms, Nebraska can lead the way in creating a more transparent, equitable, and democratic electoral process. It is time for our state to prioritize the interests of its citizens over those of a powerful few and to ensure that our government truly represents the will of the people.

Money's Role in Local Elections

Check This Out!

Money's Role in Local Elections

Even elections like Nebraska’s Public Service Commission are influenced by big donors.

See the infographic

The History of Public Campaign Funding in Nebraska

1985-1992

Under the leadership of Common Cause Nebraska, a working group is formed to explore ways of keeping campaign spending in check. Group members include Board Chair Bill Avery and board member Ruth Thone, as well as Speaker of the Legislature Dennis Baack, trucking executive Duane Acklie, and lobbyist Walt Radcliffe. Both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party also were represented.

The working group creates a bill that includes voluntary spending limits, public funding, and aggregate contribution limits. It is introduced by Speaker Baack in 1992 and passes into law that same year.

1998-2000

With the CFLA in effect, candidates for legislature limit their spending on elections. No public funding is triggered and campaign costs are kept under control.

2000

A race for University of Nebraska Regents far exceeds past costs and triggers substantial public funding. It is clear in retrospect that the spending was intended to weaken the CFLA.

2002

Another race for University Regent threatens the future of the CFLA, with six figure expense estimates potentially bankrupting the program. Thankfully, the funding isn’t triggered, and program remains intact.

2005

Yet another Regents race threatens the CFLA. David Hergert, in his bid for a Regent position, intentionally fails to file required campaign spending reports, thus blocking his opponent from receiving state funds. While Hergert wins the election, he is ultimately barred from the position by the legislature because of his actions.

2008-2011

CFLA spending limits are tied to cost of living, making them more reasonable as time progresses.

Efforts by state Senators to end the program increase, but are thwarted thanks to Common Cause and the League of Women Voters.

2012

Because of Supreme Court decisions in Citizens United (2010) and Arizona Free Enterprise vs the FEC (2011) the Nebraska Supreme Court rules the CFLA unconstitutional.

Despite that fact, the CFLA was responsible for many successes:

  • Most candidates either abided by the limit or estimated at the limit.
  • By 2012 the legislative spending limit had not exceeded $93,000.
  • Public money was only triggered 11 times and was never more than $33,000.
  • By 2012 there was more than $1,000,000 in the CFLA fund.
  • The aggregate contribution limit worked and remains constitutional but was lost when the entire CFLA was declared unconstitutional.

Your financial support helps us make an impact by holding power accountable and strengthening democracy.

Donate

Common Cause NE Testimony In Support of LB737

Position Statement

Common Cause NE Testimony In Support of LB737

Common Cause Nebraska supports efforts in the Nebraska legislature to restrain the influence of big donors. LB737 would place commonsense caps on how much an individual donor can contribute to each campaign.

Money Talks: Campaign Finance Insights from the Nebraska Primary Elections

Blog Post

Money Talks: Campaign Finance Insights from the Nebraska Primary Elections

Money plays a significant role within the American political process. From candidacy to incumbency, money directly impacts how elected officials get into public office, how they vote once in office, and what policies they choose to prioritize.

A History of Public Campaign Financing in Nebraska.

Blog Post

A History of Public Campaign Financing in Nebraska.

Once upon a time, Nebraska had a system to publicly fund legislative elections. That system made running for office more affordable but was overruled by the courts.

Related Resources

See all Related Resources

Report

Public Service Commission Donations

A review of campaign donations to candidates for Nebraska's Public Service Commission found that they were funded mostly by the industries they are elected to regulate, rather than average Nebraskans.

Close

Close

Hello! It looks like you're joining us from {state}.

Want to see what's happening in your state?

Go to Common Cause {state}