10 月 8 日,在 Ballots and Beers 上为您的投票干杯! 选票和啤酒

菜单

诉讼

新墨西哥州共和党诉奥利弗·阿米卡斯案摘要

新墨西哥州共同事业组织和我们的合作伙伴提交了一份法庭之友陈述书,表示不支持任何一方就这一针对该州国会选区地图的挑战向法庭提供指导。

On July 5, 2023, the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled in Republican Party of New Mexico v. Oliver that partisan gerrymandering may violate the Equal Protection Clause of the New Mexico Constitution. This case challenges the state’s congressional map, which legislators approved in 2021. The New Mexico Supreme Court adopted U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s three-part test from her Rucho 诉 Common Cause dissent as its new partisan gerrymander standard. The state Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court to determine whether the congressional map passes constitutional muster.

Common Cause New Mexico, the League of Women Voters of New Mexico, and the Election Reformers Network joined social science experts to file an amicus brief on August 14, 2023 in the trial court. The brief does not support either party, but instead provides guidance to the trial court about the various tools it can use to determine whether a voting map is unlawful. It outlines the legal framework and evidence applicable at each step of the three-part test and addresses relevant data on the maps themselves.

In the underlying case challenging the congressional map, the New Mexico Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the trial court’s decision upholding the congressional map in November 2023.

Read the Amicus Brief 阅读新闻稿

您的资金支持帮助我们发挥以下作用 追究权力责任 并加强民主。

关闭

关闭

你好!看来你是从 {state} 加入我们的。

想看看你所在州发生了什么吗?

前往共同事业 {state}