RALEIGH, N.C. — In an extreme departure from precedent, the North Carolina Supreme Court announced Friday it would rehear two cases — one involving statewide redistricting and the other involving a discriminatory voter ID bill — after Republican lawmakers petitioned for a different outcome following the election of new justices, which flipped the court to a Republican majority.
Lawmakers filed two petitions for rehearings January 20, 2023: one in Harper v. Hall — a case brought by Common Cause North Carolina after lawmakers gerrymandered legislative and Congressional maps to give Republicans an edge at the disproportionate expense of Black voters — and the other in Holmes laban kay Moore pagkatapos isang desisyon noong nakaraang buwan Tinanggal ang kanilang pinakahuling pag-ulit ng isang photo voter ID law bilang isang labag sa konstitusyon na panukalang ipinasa sa bahagi upang magdiskrimina laban sa mga African American na botante.
“The state Supreme Court’s landmark ruling just last year was clear that partisan gerrymandering violates the constitutional freedoms of North Carolinians,” said Bob Phillips, executive director ng Common Cause North Carolina. “Sadly, politicians in the legislature refuse to respect our rights as they seek power to illegally rig our elections. This fight is not over. Once again, we will stand up for the people of North Carolina and defend our state’s constitution against political attacks.”
Common Cause, represented by Southern Coalition for Social Justice and co-counsel Hogan Lovells, asked the Court to dismiss lawmakers’ request in Harper as frivolous, improperly motivated and grossly lacking in the requirements of propriety.
“We’re disappointed the Court is giving legislators another bite at the apple, and we maintain that this is politically motivated and outside the scope of what’s permitted by the Constitution,” said Hilary Harris Klein, Senior Counsel para sa Mga Karapatan sa Pagboto sa Southern Coalition para sa Social Justice. “However, we look forward to arguing this case again before the Court and showing what already has been captured on the record.”
Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls wrote a dissent, with Justice Michael Morgan joining, to the majority’s decision to rehear Harper.
“The majority’s order fails to acknowledge the radical break with 205 years of history that the decision to rehear this case represents,” Earls wrote. “It has long been the practice of this Court to respect precedent and the principle that once the Court has ruled, that ruling will not be disturbed merely because of a change in the Court’s composition.”
She added that data from the Supreme Court’s electronic filing system shows that since January 1993, a total of 214 petitions for rehearing were filed, but only two were granted.
Harper will be reheard by the Court on March 14, 2023.
Sa Holmes, the state’s high court already decided in December to strike down lawmakers’ most recent iteration of a photo voter ID law as an unconstitutional measure passed in part to discriminate against African American voters.
The Court majority also calendared that matter to be reheard on March 14, 2023.
“This certainly isn’t the outcome we’d hoped for, especially in a settled case with the legislators reasserting the exact same contentions they previously argued unsuccessfully, but we will continue to fight for the rights of all people in North Carolina to vote freely and fairly and look forward to making that case again before the new Court,” said Jeff Loperfido, Pansamantalang Punong Tagapayo ng Mga Karapatan sa Pagboto sa Southern Coalition for Social Justice.
The case was originally filed by Southern Coalition for Social Justice joined by co-counsel from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, in December 2018. It alleged North Carolina’s 2018 voter ID law (S.B. 824), approved by a Republican-led supermajority in a lame-duck session, was racially motivated.
Justice Morgan wrote a dissent in Holmes with Justice Earls joining.
“The allowance of this extraordinary remedy to petitioners in this case, under the existent circumstances, may serve to foment concerns that North Carolina’s highest state court is engaged in the determination of challenging and legitimate legal disputes with a perceived desire to reach outcomes which are inconsistent with this Court’s well-established principles of adherence to legal precedent, stare decisis, and the rule of law,” Morgan wrote.
Mga Contact sa Media:
Bryan Warner, Karaniwang Dahilan | bwarner@commoncause.org | 919-836-0027
Melissa Boughton, SCSJ | melissa@scsj.org | 830-481-6901
Karaniwang Dahilan North Carolina ay isang nonpartisan grassroots organization na nakatuon sa pagtataguyod ng mga pangunahing halaga ng demokrasya ng Amerika. Nagtatrabaho kami upang lumikha ng bukas, tapat at may pananagutan na pamahalaan na nagsisilbi sa interes ng publiko; itaguyod ang pantay na karapatan, pagkakataon at representasyon para sa lahat; at bigyan ng kapangyarihan ang lahat ng tao na iparinig ang kanilang mga boses sa prosesong pampulitika.
Ang Southern Coalition for Social Justice, na itinatag noong 2007, ay nakikipagtulungan sa mga komunidad na may kulay at mahihirap na ekonomiya sa Timog upang ipagtanggol at isulong ang kanilang mga karapatang pampulitika, panlipunan, at pang-ekonomiya sa pamamagitan ng kumbinasyon ng legal na adbokasiya, pananaliksik, pag-oorganisa, at komunikasyon. Matuto pa sa southerncoalition.org at sundin ang aming gawain Twitter, Facebook, at Instagram.