菜单

新闻稿

宾夕法尼亚州参议院规则和行政提名委员会半夜投票修改宾夕法尼亚州宪法

共和党计划花费数百万纳税人的钱将这些措施列入市政初选选票中——大约五分之一的选民会看到这些措施并能够表达自己的意见。每项宪法修正案的广告费用约为 $2 万美元。到目前为止,如果按原样通过,SB106 将花费纳税人 $12 万美元,他们甚至还没有机会投票。 

Late last night, Pennsylvania’s Senate Rules and Executive Nominations Committee voted on an amendment to 参议院第 106 号法案, a bill proposing five unrelated constitutional amendments, including: the creation of a new government agency to “audit” elections; allowing candidates for governor to choose their own running mates; and removing state constitutional protections for Pennsylvanians seeking an abortion.

The full Senate is considering this bill now. Livestream is available at https://www.pasen.gov/video/senatevideo.cfm

Passed in the middle of the night while most constituents were sleeping, out of a committee that never considers bills of this subject matter, and with little debate and no public input, these amendments make drastic changes to Pennsylvania’s constitution that require much more deliberation and discussion than what the Committee afforded.  

Previous consideration of the bill also did not allow for robust public discourse.

Statement of Common Cause Pennsylvania Executive Director Khalif Ali 

We are deeply disturbed that Pennsylvania’s Senate Republicans have again flouted the democratic process by amending a bill proposing constitutional amendments in the middle of the night. This is nothing more than a blatant attempt by partisan operatives to hijack the constitutional amendment process for their own benefit. 

This is not the first time Senate Bill 106 has been amended in a process that was not open or transparent to avoid the governor’s veto pen. In December of last year, House Republicans amended SB106 at the last minute with very little debate and no opportunity for public input just before the House recessed for the holidays. 

These constitutional amendments are not inconsequential. One amendment aims to make voting more difficult for low-income voters by imposing unnecessary voter ID requirements on top of the existing rules. Strict voter ID laws disproportionately impact Black, Latinx, Indigenous, Asian, Pacific Islander and other communities of color, the elderly, and people with disabilities. Our elected officials should be working to ensure that every eligible voter can cast a meaningful vote – not erecting barriers to the ballot box. 

Another amendment to SB106 creates an unnecessary and expensive bureaucracy to duplicate the same election administration functions that counties already perform. 

共和党计划花费数百万纳税人的钱将这些措施列入市政初选选票中——大约五分之一的选民会看到这些措施并能够表达自己的意见。每项宪法修正案的广告费用约为 $2 万美元。到目前为止,如果按原样通过,SB106 将花费纳税人 $12 万美元,他们甚至还没有机会投票。 

And then the proposed Bureau of Election Audits would waste an additional $3 million of taxpayer dollars each year duplicating the election administration work already done by the Department of State – even though Pennsylvania already conducts robust post-election audits. 

Any proposed amendment to Pennsylvania’s constitution should undergo rigorous and robust debate, not be slipped in under the cover of night or tacked on at the last minute before recess or break. 

Pennsylvania deserves a legislature that respects the voice of the people and conducts itself in an open, honest, and transparent way. Instead, we see a small minority of partisan operatives disrespecting democratic norms and values that we as Pennsylvanians, and as Americans, have the right to expect from our elected officials.  

We the People deserve better from our legislators than these procedural gymnastics. Pennsylvania voters want rigorous and well-reasoned debate, not late-night subterfuge and last minute maneuvers in the hopes that voters don’t notice. We noticed, and we are going to fight this with all the resources available to us.

关闭

  • 关闭

    你好!看来你是从 {state} 加入我们的。

    想看看你所在州发生了什么吗?

    前往共同事业 {state}