Tinuturuan namin ang mga taga-Wisconsin tungkol sa kakulangan ng aming estado ng epektibong mga tuntunin sa pagtanggi sa hudisyal, at itinutulak ang mas matibay na mga pamantayan sa pagtanggi upang matiyak ang walang kinikilingan na hustisya sa mga korte ng Wisconsin.
"This issue is about fairness, it’s about transparency, and it's about people having faith in our court system... to me it’s a no-brainer."
- Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske
Equal access to justice for all
The idea that “everyone deserves their day in court” is both central and essential to our democracy – and is exactly why we are educating Wisconsinites about the need for strong recusal rules for our state’s judges and justices.
Currently, no rule has been established in Wisconsin requiring a member of our state judiciary to step aside (or “recuse” themselves) if they received a large campaign donation or benefited financially from a party in a case before their court.
In fact, Wisconsin’s judges and justices are allowed to decide for themselves when they should recuse from a case. And this current rule was actually written by a partisan, deep-pocketed special interest group, Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, and adopted verbatim by the then-conservative majority on the court in 2009.
Further, there is no requirement that Wisconsin judges inform individuals involved in a case in their court that a bias might exist.
This potential for even the appearance of bias in our courts corrodes the very essence of “justice for all.”
Strong recusal rules would repair and strengthen public confidence in Wisconsin’s judiciary by ensuring equal access to justice in our state courts.
"Nobody cares about a judge until they're standing in front of one – and then they care very much about a judge."
- Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Louis Butler
In January 2017, 54 retired jurists from all over Wisconsin – including two former State Supreme Court Justices – petitioned the Wisconsin Supreme Court to adopt strong and clear recusal rules for Justices and Judges at all levels with specific thresholds that would trigger mandatory recusal from cases. Wisconsin was found to have the fourth weakest judicial recusal rules in the nation and these retired jurists sounded the alarm. Common Cause Wisconsin strongly supported this petition and submitted strong testimony to the Justices.
And yet, five justices voted against conducting any public hearings on the petition. The two other justices voted to conduct them.
Similarly, on April 20, 2017, by the same vote, the Supreme Court rejected the petition of the retired jurists and kept the current policy of self-recusal in place.
Since then, Common Cause in Wisconsin and the retired judges have worked to revive the issue of judicial recusal in Wisconsin that had been seemingly buried with the Supreme Court’s action of April 20, 2017.
In October 2017, we held three public hearings on the issue – in Green Bay, Milwaukee, and Madison – and continues our outreach and educational efforts in 2018, 2019 and 2020 elsewhere in the state including in La Crosse and Wausau.
And, finally in 2023, we have a progressive Wisconsin Supreme Court majority that has signaled it is open to revisiting the judicial recusal issue and in working toward regaining public confidence in the impartiality of the state’s highest court and for courts at all levels.
The fairness and impartiality of our judges depends mightily on their separation from the effect and influence of campaign contributors and outside, special interest campaign spending groups.
Maaari mong isulong ang kinakailangang repormang ito sa Wisconsin sa pamamagitan ng paggigiit na ang Korte Suprema ng Wisconsin, at ang mga hukom sa lahat ng antas ay sumusuporta sa mas matibay na mga tuntunin sa pagtanggi.
Wisconsinites deserve free and equal access to justice and an impartial court system.
Ang iyong pinansiyal na suporta ay tumutulong sa amin na magkaroon ng epekto sa pamamagitan ng may pananagutan sa kapangyarihan at pagpapalakas ng demokrasya.
Ang Maling Pagpapasya ng Korte Suprema ng Estado para sa “Least Change” Voting Maps ay Lumilikha ng Agarang Pangangailangan para sa Muling Pagdistrito ng Reporma
Ano ang maaaring gawin upang kontrahin ang pagkasuklam at pagkadismaya na nararamdaman ngayon ng karamihan sa mga taga-Wisconsin tungkol sa kung ano ang ginawa ng karamihang Republikano sa Lehislatura ng Wisconsin at ngayon, ang mga konserbatibong aktibista sa Korte Suprema ng Wisconsin ay ginawa upang suwayin ang kalooban ng mga tao at palawigin at patibayin sa lugar ng kanilang mga rigged na mapa ng pagboto para sa isa pang sampung taon? Ang sagot ay malinaw at simple. Dapat nating doblehin ang ating pagsisikap at determinasyon na baguhin ang kasalukuyang corrupt status quo.
